Pages

Monday, October 10, 2011

Is it Scriptural: Messianic Jews And The Law -Jack Kelley

 

WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE?

The Christian Issues Network

"IS IT SCRIPTURAL"
"Sometimes some say things are scriptural when they may not be Biblical"

Jack Kelley 

Messianic Jews And The Law

I want to ask you something concerning my Messianic Jewish belief. Are Jews still required to keep the feasts, eat kosher, and observe the Sabbath or were all these things done away with when Jesus died on the cross?

 

Q. I’ve written to you a couple of times before and have found your answers to be wise and biblical. So, I want to ask you something concerning my Messianic Jewish belief. I am aware that you were a part of a Messianic congregation from one of you posts.

My question is this: Are Jews still required to keep the feasts, eat kosher, and observe the Sabbath or were all these things done away with when Jesus died on the cross? My congregation still observes all the feasts and Holy days. Many eat kosher(some more strict then others), and they have services on Friday night and Saturday morning.

Lately, I have been searching for a new congregation because my Messianic one is so far away from me and it’s getting expensive. Not to mention if I try to make Torah studies and prayer meetings. Most of the Christian congregations tell me it’s no longer required to do these things(other then attending services). I just want to do what is right.

As I read it, Jesus and the disciples followed the laws and kept the feasts. Wouldn’t this mean, that everyone who considers themselves a follower of Jesus to do the same? I know in Acts the issue of circumcision was brought up for Gentiles. They basically said to keep some of the laws but not all of them, not the ones that applied to Jews anyway.

So where does a Messianic Jew stand? I sort of feel I’m in between two drawn swords, the Christian community on the one side, and the Torah observant Jews on the other. Any guidance you can offer will be appreciated.

A. This is an issue that has plagued the Messianic movement all along. Many who were formerly observant Jews insist on keeping the Law, while Gentile members often don’t see the need. I think the Messianic movement has an identity crisis of sorts. Though as followers of Jesus they’re part of the Church, there’s a concerted effort on the part of many to try and maintain a separate identity. Often it results in this “stuck in the middle” feeling you describe.

The Bible clearly teaches us two things. First, the Law was a shadow of things to come, not the reality which is found in Jesus (Hebr. 10:1 & Romans 3:19-24). Second, attempting to keep the Law can be a dangerous flirtation with legalism, because while no one can actually do it, we can fool ourselves into thinking we are, and that can lead to the same spiritual arrogance that so offended the Lord (Matt. 23). I know that some Jews believe that even after accepting the Lord as their savior, they’re still under the Law, but in my opinion the writer to the Hebrews believed otherwise and went to great lengths to persuade his readers as well.

In the Messianic Fellowship I led, we celebrated only the Erev Shabbat (Friday night) service. Some of us also attended Sunday services in a Gentile Church. We observed the Feasts and Holy Days to learn about their traditions and the incredible spiritual and prophetic significance of each one. I think this contributed to a growth in our Biblical understanding that would have been impossible to achieve in any other way.

The spiritual and physiological benefits found in keeping the commandments and kosher laws are well documented and beyond dispute, but turning them into a works-centered religion is what got the Jews in trouble in the first place.

Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ. (Col. 2:16-17)

 

 

Is it Scriptural: Are Messianic Jews Part Of The Church? -Jack Kelley

 

WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE?

The Christian Issues Network

"IS IT SCRIPTURAL"
"Sometimes some say things are scriptural when they may not be Biblical"

Jack Kelley 

Are Messianic Jews Part Of The Church?

Q.  Can you clarify if converted Jews that are now part of the church are supposed to keep the law? I’m not referring to the sacrifices, but to the feasts, kosher eating, observance of the Jewish calendar.  Some family members who are Christian are now part of a Messianic congregation and they acknowledge salvation through Jesus, are now only eating kosher, keeping their feasts, and say we are drafted into Israel and the early church members were Jews that still kept all of that.

 

A.  I know there are Messianic Jews who choose to keep at least part of the Law. It’s like they have one foot in the Old Covenant and one foot in the New.  The question is whether they just want to follow the tradition to learn from it, which is OK, or whether they’re trying to either complete or maintain the work of their salvation, which is not.  Any path to salvation that combines grace and human effort is destined to fail because it ultimately leaves us responsible for our own salvation.  Romans 3:20-22 says no one will be declared righteous by observing the Law, but only by receiving the righteousness that comes through faith in Jesus Christ.  You can’t have it both ways.

Paul wrote that regardless of background, a member of the Church is no longer considered either a Jew or a Gentile (Galatians 3:28). He also said not to let anyone judge us by what we eat or drink, or with regard to religious festivals, new moon celebrations or sabbath days.  He said these were a shadow of things to come but the reality is found in Christ (Colossians 2:16-17).

 

 

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Is it Scriptural: Calvinism And Arminianism -Jack Kelley

 

WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE?

The Christian Issues Network

"IS IT SCRIPTURAL"
"Sometimes some say things are scriptural when they may not be Biblical"

Jack Kelley
 


Calvinism And Arminianism

Q.  Would it be safe to say that you espouse Arminianism?

 

A.  No it would not.  Both Calvinists and Arminians are correct in what they affirm.  Calvinists affirm eternal security and Arminians affirm agency (freedom of choice). But both are incorrect in what they deny.  Calvinists deny agency and Arminians deny security. I affirm both agency and security.  I believe we can (must) choose to be saved (Matt. 7:7-8) and that once we do it can never be revoked for any reason (Ephes 1:13-14).

Print Friendly
Share

Tags: 

Related Posts:

 

 

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Is it Scriptural: The Literal Interpretation -Jack Kelley

 

WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE?

The Christian Issues Network

"IS IT SCRIPTURAL"
"Sometimes some say things are scriptural when they may not be Biblical"

Jack Kelley
 



The Literal Interpretation

Q.  I was discussing something with a family member and they said ‘You just can’t interpret the Bible literally because so many people argue over what the literal interpretation of that verse is.’ He makes a good point. In what way should we go about finding the ‘literal’ interpretation of a verse? And another question, when do we know when to not interpret a passage of Scripture literally?

 

A.  There’s only one true literal interpretation, so among those who argue only one can be correct.  You can tell you have the literal translation because you read it just as it’s written taking the context of the passage into consideration. According to the dictionary the context is the set of circumstances or facts that surround a particular passage.  It can be discovered by looking at the verses that precede or follow it that influence its meaning or effect.   Most arguments over the interpretation of Scripture have more to do with context than anything else.

We know we shouldn’t interpret a passage literally when the Bible tells us not to.  For instance parables and other obviously symbolic passages are not meant to be understood literally.  A good rule of thumb is that if the literal interpretation of a passage makes sense, then we shouldn’t try to take it any other way.

Tags: 

Related Posts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Is it Scriptural: Keeping the Marriage Bed Pure -Jack Kelley

 

WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE?

The Christian Issues Network

"IS IT SCRIPTURAL"
"Sometimes some say things are scriptural when they may not be Biblical"

Jack Kelley
 

Keeping the Marriage Bed Pure

Q. We have been in a discussion on “sodomy” in our Christian forum. Hebrews 13:4 warns us to keep the marriage bed pure.   Does this mean a married couple can’t practice “sodomy” or any other so-called  unnatural sexual acts?

 

Q. The Bible doesn’t contain a list of approved sexual acts for married couples. The admonition to keep the marriage pure bed relates to husbands and wives keeping themselves exclusively for each other. I’ve come to the view that what ever a married couple freely agrees to in the privacy of their own bedroom is OK as long as the highest standards of mutual love and respect are maintained. Neither party should ever feel pressured into performing an act they feel is inconsistent with that goal. But anything they both believe will help express their love for each other is permissible.

Tags: 

Related Posts:

 

 

 

Monday, August 29, 2011

Is it Scriptural: Turn It Over To Jesus -Jack Kelley

 

WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE?

The Christian Issues Network

"IS IT SCRIPTURAL"
"Sometimes some say things are scriptural when they may not be Biblical"

Jack Kelley
 

Turn It Over To Jesus

Q. What does it mean when Christian friends of mine tell me to turn all my troubles over to Jesus, or lay it (them) at the foot of the cross. I’m going through some difficult personal issues and all I hear from my Christian friends is that I need to pray about it and lay my troubles at the foot of the cross or turn it all over to Jesus. When I ask them to explain, they can’t.  They just tell me that Jesus will take care of it. Does this mean I say a prayer about my circumstance, tell Jesus that I turning it all over to him, and then ignore the problem and move on hoping the Lord will take care of the issue? I can tell you that my prayers are going unanswered and I’m not believing that Christ is taking on my problems for me.

 

A. Solving a personal problem can be difficult because the solution is often beyond our control. Making ourselves responsible for a result we don’t have control over is a recipe for stress.  Turning a problem over to Jesus doesn’t mean we ignore it or stop working on it.  It means we change our perspective about it.  We still apply whatever skill or ability we have but we add two things to the mix.  First we pray for divine assistance in finding a solution.  Second we turn the outcome over to the Lord, subordinating our will in the matter to His.

There’s really no risk in this because we know that God is working everything together for our good (Romans 8:28), and giving Him the responsibility for the result takes the stress away.  We just have to be willing to let the Lord produce the result He wants in a situation, even if it turns out to different from the one we wanted.

So laying our problems at the foot of the cross means deciding to let His will be done in a matter, and letting Him work through us to achieve it. Jesus said, “Come to me you who are weary and heavy laden and I will give you rest” (Matt. 11:28).

Tags: 

Related Posts:

ShareThis